data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c9c1/6c9c187e832c321cfa0435a7a4f3d62b10cb1a7b" alt=""
Hello, I’m Miriam Dolnick. I’m in Tucson by way of Earlham College, by way of Chicago, IL my home. This has certainly been a week of emotional tumults. We began last Monday by going to court to watch the process of Operation Streamline. Streamline is a program that started in 2005 and has been in Tucson for only the past year. It began with the intention of arresting and convicting in federal court a goal of 100 migrants a day who were caught crossing the border. The idea from border patrol’s standpoint is that convicting migrants and creating a criminal record for them will lower future border crossing due to the risk of greater consequences. Each day at the Tucson courthouse dozens of migrants are tried (last Monday there were 76 people) and given prison sentences from 3 to 180 days. When they are released, they are often intentionally separated from those that they have been traveling with, even driven hundreds of miles away from the location they were picked up in, in order to make their journey more challenging.
It is an extremely difficult process to witness. As soon as you enter the courtroom, the first thing that you notice is the sounds of chains. All 76 of the migrants that were on trial were handcuffed and in leg shackles. Being in the presence of 76 people wearing leg shackles is alarming in such an emotionally physical way. While sitting and watching this process I felt completely powerless. The fact that as witnesses we were forced to sit behind the United States prosecutors was also hard to stomach. The 76 migrants being tried were represented by no more than six lawyers who read the names of the men and women they were representing from a list at the beginning of the session. When the men and women who were on trial were asked questions (such as if they understood aspects of what was happening in the courtroom, what it meant to be pleading guilty, etc., all of which was difficult for anyone who had never seen the process before to understand) they had to respond in unison (sí or no), if someone had a question they were asked to stand. No one ever stood up.
Though we’ve been learning about the inequality and the oppression that takes place along the border for the past month, I feel that this was the first time we were forced to witness people being treating so poorly. The court case was simply a series of motions. No one was being tried fairly, and everyone seemed to be frustrated, the migrants, lawyers, the judge, us. Some of the major criticism for Streamline is that it’s an ineffective use of resources. That time and money is being spent not prosecuting the “real crimes.” Because of this process, the prisons are overflowing with people and many cases involving drugs and sex crimes are being pushed to the wayside, all just to prove a point. I think we all left the courthouse feeling physically drained and angry, unsure of what, if any, power we had to change things. I think one important thing that I took away was the understanding that the American public has very little knowledge about this happening, and even less knowledge about what the process itself looks like. The most frustrating thing is that we, as taxpayers, are funding this atrocity. This experience was both moving and infuriating.
It w
I ended the week by going on a Samaritans run early Sunday morning. Samaritans is a volunteer organization that goes out into the desert to do water drops and bring food and other sorts of aid to migrants who are in need. One other volunteer and I left Tucson at seven a.m. to drive through the desert after a
It was quite the intense week emotionally, physically, and academically. We are leaving for Mexico very soon though and are about to embark on a completely different phase of the semester.
1 comment:
What time does this occur daily? Noon? 13:00?
Thanks,
Andrea
Post a Comment